The book only glances towards more normative understandings of the political, and then very briefly, nodding towards Rancière’s insistence that rupture emerges from “equality” but not addressing how “equality” might be theorized. So if claims that politics is “the specific site of the articulation of a non-unity,” to quote Nancy (page 75), are not your cup of tea, then this book is probably not for you either.

şimdi bu uzun cümlede sormak istediğim tek bir yer var. bazen cümlenin önünü ve sonunu görmek istenilebilir diye yazdım :

So if claims that politics is derken if claims arasında it mi var birde anlamı: böylece eğer talep edilirse... mi?