No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.

1-One can infer from the passage that the communication of our emotions and wishes ...........

a)is an indispensable need not only for humans but for animals as well
b)gives proof to the theory that language is formed of the sounds in nature
c)has had more impact on language than the spontaneous cries of man
d)forms the basis of social groups from tribes to nations
e)may have led to the development of primitive language into a sophisticated one

E doğru olmalı...The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).

No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.

1-One can infer from the passage that the communication of our emotions and wishes ...........

a)is an indispensable need not only for humans but for animals as well
b)gives proof to the theory that language is formed of the sounds in nature
c)has had more impact on language than the spontaneous cries of man
d)forms the basis of social groups from tribes to nations
e)may have led to the development of primitive language into a sophisticated one

Kırmızı yerlere bir bakalım emin değilim ama sanırım E şıkkı...:)

We learn from the passage that some theories about the origin of language .........

a)are based on the fact that language shapes our emotions and the way we think
b)state that we humans are born with innate ability to speak
c)find proof in the records written down by the oldest civilisations on earth
d)claim that speech started with the imitation of the natural sounds
e)have proven to be wrong because they found no supprot in the history of primitive man

sorudaki some theries derken 3teorinin aynı anda yani ortak mı vermek istediği

hepsini açıkalrsanız sevinirim kolay gelsin

evet e sıkkı cümlennin cevirisini yaparak acıkalrmısınız

No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.

1-One can infer from the passage that the communication of our emotions and wishes ...........

a)is an indispensable need not only for humans but for animals as well
b)gives proof to the theory that language is formed of the sounds in nature
c)has had more impact on language than the spontaneous cries of man
d)forms the basis of social groups from tribes to nations
e)may have led to the development of primitive language into a sophisticated one

galiba E şıkkı doğru.Bizim duygu ve iyi dileklerimizin iletişimi ilkel dil in gelişmesine yol açmış bir karmaşa olabilir. ( fakat bu teorilerden hiçbiri dil'in kökenini tamıyla açıklayamaz) dedim ama ???ya sanırım Çok Türkçe düşündüm:)

A doğru olmalı...dil duygularımızı ve düşünme yeteneğimizi şekillendiriyor.( 2. SORU )

No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.

We learn from the passage that some theories about the origin of language .........

a)are based on the fact that language shapes our emotions and the way we think
b)state that we humans are born with innate ability to speak
c)find proof in the records written down by the oldest civilisations on earth
d)claim that speech started with the imitation of the natural sounds
e)have proven to be wrong because they found no supprot in the history of primitive man

sorudaki some theries derken 3teorinin aynı anda yani ortak mı vermek istediği

hepsini açıkalrsanız sevinirim kolay gelsin

Cevabım D şıkkı...(2. soru)

Cevabım D şıkkı...(2. soru)

Ama bazı teoriler diyor, birini sorsaydı haklı olabilirdiniz.:)

ya aslında sormak istedigim ikinci soru için birkaç teori iddia ediyorsa o üç teorininde ortak bir tanımlamasının bulunması gerekmez mi bi de 1.soruyu nerden bulduysanız cevabını o cümleyi cevirerek acıklar mısınız

Ama bazı teoriler diyor, birini sorsaydı haklı olabilirdiniz.:)

evet bnimde sormak istedigim bu ama cevao yine d verilmiş bence yanlıs sorulmus soru kökünde

2. soruya D demekl istiyorum sanırım şeydi doğadaki bazı sonudları taklitiyle başladı gibi birşey???

ya aslında sormak istedigim ikinci soru için birkaç teori iddia ediyorsa o üç teorininde ortak bir tanımlamasının bulunması gerekmez mi bi de 1.soruyu nerden bulduysanız cevabını o cümleyi cevirerek acıklar mısınız

ilk soruda parçanın geneline bakmalısın, tek bir yerde açıklanmıyor.Ama bilmen gereken her 3 varsayım içinde kesin bir kanıt olmaması.... may....... gidenlere dikkat.....

Ama bazı teoriler diyor, birini sorsaydı haklı olabilirdiniz.:)

Ama parçada birkaç tane teoriden söz ediyor... :)

It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires

1.sorunun cevabı burda saklı gibi geldi ama cümleye hakim olamadım iletişim ilkel dilden daha ileri bir dile gecebilcegini belirtiyor ben onu bulamadım pek

Benim kırmızı işaretlediğim yerleri bir yorumlar mısın? :) 1 soru için...

Ama parçada birkaç tane teoriden söz ediyor... :)

ama o bir kaç teoride hepsinin amacı aynı değilki birisi hayvandan cıkan sesleri digeri echo words leri savunuyor

cevaplar neymiş?

Cevabı çok merak ettim (2. soru) ?

2.soru icin d demiştim ama görmediniz sanırım 1.soruda e ama ben hala anlayamadım acıklamaları:)

biraz yukarılara götüreyim yine gorulmez bu soru:)

paragraflara olan ilgi cok az buarada

paragraflara olan ilgi cok az buarada
Aslında şu sıralar sınav zamanları olmadığı, dolayısıyla yoğun bir çalışma temposu olmadığı için üyeler genellikle uzun sorulardan kaçınıyorlar.

o da dogru hocam kafama cok takıldıgı içn yazmıstım bu paragrafı

No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.


1-One can infer from the passage that the communication of our emotions and wishes ...........

a)is an indispensable need not only for humans but for animals as well (bunların bir ihtiyaç olduğundan bahsedilmemiş paragrafta)
b)gives proof to the theory that language is formed of the sounds in nature (tam kanıt yok zaten. Haliyle olmaz.)
c)has had more impact on language than the spontaneous cries of man (paragrafta böyle bir karşılaştırma yok)
d)forms the basis of social groups from tribes to nations (böyle bir aşamadan bahsetmemiş)
e)may have led to the development of primitive language into a sophisticated one

No primitive man has left a record of the way in which language started.It may have begun in individual cries,of pain or fear,or wonder,or triumph and joy but it was soon brought to social ends,for the communication of these and other feelings and desires.One theory pictures laguage as springing from spontaneous animal cries.Another sees the start of words in emotional outbursts.Then,there s the theory which sees language arising from imitation of natural sounds.The word-stuff of the first theory still appears in the noises we use to say yes(uhuhu),to indicate that we havent heard (hnnn?),to mark our hesitation(hmmmmm) or our scorn(hn!).The second theory finds support today in exclamations(Ah!..ow!)and calls(ho!hey!).The third has the richest body of actual speech to favour it,in the many onomatopoetic or echoic words:hum,tud,bump,boom,buzz,murmur,and hiss.But none of the theories fully explain the origin of language.

We learn from the passage that some theories about the origin of language .........

a)are based on the fact that language shapes our emotions and the way we think
b)state that we humans are born with innate ability to speak
c)find proof in the records written down by the oldest civilisations on earth
d)claim that speech started with the imitation of the natural sounds
e)have proven to be wrong because they found no supprot in the history of primitive man
D şıkkı dışında kabul edilebilir bir cevap yok.Ama onu da kötünün iyisi olarak kabulederdim.

hocam birinci soruda individual cries,fear,etc bunların hepsi sosyal kopukluklara yol actıgın için mi mi daha düzhün iletişim arayıslarına yol actıgını vurguluyor dimi