A Poisonous Cup of Coffee, with Jane and Debbie added for the sake of gender equality.

Tom[/Jane], hating his[/her] wife[/husband] and wanting her[/him] dead, puts poison in her[/his] coffee, thereby killing her[/him]. Joe[/Debbie] also hates his[/her] wife[/husband] and would like her[/him] dead. One day, Joe's[/Debbie's] wife[/husband] accidentally puts poison in her[/his] coffee, thinking it's cream. Joe[/Debbie] has the antidote, but he[/she] does not give it to her[/him]. Knowing that he[/she] is the only one who can save her[/him], he[/she] lets her[/him] die. Is Joe's[/Debbie's] failure to act as bad as Tom's[/Jane's] action?

In that way or the other, the result is she is dead and although he could have changed this tragic end he didn t interfere in as this was what he had wanted, so ,of course he is the one to put the blame on :))

If i was to sentence the first one to 20 years, i would sentence the second one to the half of it cause the second one's actor did not planned to murder.

Although the first one poisoned his(her) wife(husband) the second one did it accidentally but ı think they both share the same sin 'cause despite this two different case they both killed their wife(husband) intentionally.

I am confused :ices_tot::confused::eek: